Richard Koenigsberg’s Succinct Summary of The Law of Sacrifice:
“The Proof of the Pudding is in the Dying”

From Thuppahi's Blog 

• The desire to die and kill–in war, genocide, revolution and terrorism–grows out of attachment to an ideology conceived as absolute
• Dying and killing are undertaken with the purpose of validating an ideology (“proof of the pudding”).
• Dead and mangled bodies on the field of battle testify to the “truth” of some entity or idea: that which is the cause of the dying and killing. People cannot conceive that dying and killing occur in the name of nothing.
• The nature of the entity or idea for which people die and kill is fungible. People have died and killed for France, for Germany, for the British Empire, for the Communist revolution, for Allah, for the Emperor, for a Tamil homeland, to preserve the Union, and for “freedom and democracy.”
• Each culture has its own preferred absolute. Rarely does a society believe that there is “nothing to kill and die for” (John Lennon).
• The method of verifying the sacred ideal remains the same, regardless of the content of the ideal. Verification consists of demonstrating a willingness to die and kill.

Thuppahi's Blog  MICHAEL ROBERTS was trained in history and the social sciences at Peradeniya University in Sri Lanka. This education was in the British empiricist tradition. His initial Ph.D work on agrarian policy took him into intellectual history as well as economic history and political economy. Once he began in the late 1960s to look at the social base of the nationalist movement in British Ceylon, his researches moved him into social history.