_

"CONCEPTUAL METAPHORS"

Section II of Ideology, Metaphor & Unconscious Fantasy

 

Koenigsberg, Lakoff and Johnson

Contents of Ideology, Metaphor and Unconscious Fantasy

  1. Ideology and Metaphor
  2. Conceptual Metaphors
  3. Fantasy and the Embodied Mind
  4. Psychic Determinism
  5. The Human Body and the Body Politic

TO READ THE COMPLETE PAPER, CLICK HERE.

II. Conceptual Metaphors

The theories of George Lakoff and Mark L. Johnson have become influential in Cognitive Psychology. According to their concept of metaphorical mapping, slots in a “source domain schema” get mapped into slots in a “target domain,” shaping our perceptions. Target domains are abstract concepts, whereas source domains are familiar, most often physical, ideas.

In The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason (1990), Johnson writes about “imaginative projection,” a principle whereby the body (i.e., physical experience and its structures) works its way up into the mind (i.e., mental operations).

Johnson states that metaphors are not simply “figures of speech,” rather constitute “pervasive, indispensable structures of understanding by means of which we comprehend our world.”

Johnson states that image-schematic structures of imagination (derived from the body and physical experience) are “extended and elaborated as abstract structures of meaning and patterns of thought.”

Metaphors in speech and text convey the presence of the body within the mind. Structures of embodied experience generate “conceptual metaphors.”

My analysis of metaphor grows out of research on Hitler and Nazism, which began with Hitler’s Ideology: A Study in Psychoanalytic Sociology (1975). Identifying recurring images and metaphors within the rhetoric of Hitler and other Nazis, I conclude that Nazi ideology was defined, supported and sustained by a coherent fantasy: that Germany was an enormous body politic suffering from a potentially fatal disease.

Hitler’s entire worldview grew out of his belief that Germany was an actual body—and Jews pathogenic organisms whose continued presence within the body politic would threaten to destroy the nation. These images and metaphors occur again and again in his writings and speeches.

The Final Solution grew out of Hitler’s perception of reality, representing the performance of an immunological fantasy. Hitler and the Nazis sought to destroy Jews—imagined to be the source of Germany’s disease—in order to prevent the death of the body politic.

Somehow, Hitler was able to convey this fantasy to his closest colleagues, and eventually to the German people. A sufficient number of Germans plugged into—embraced—this fantasy so that Hitler was able to enact it. A shared fantasy generated an ideology—and was the source of the history that the Nazis created.

In Analogies of War (1992),Y. F. Khong points to the importance of studying the rhetoric of leaders and decision-makers in order to find “systematic metaphors.” The repeated use of the same set of analogies over time allows one to be confident that metaphors are playing “truly a cognitive function” within political leaders’ rhetoric.

The metaphor that occurs most frequently in Hitler’s writings and speeches is that of Germany as a living organism. The Jew is depicted as a bacterium, virus, parasite and “force of disintegration” working to destroy the national organism. Hitler’s fundamental life mission was to destroy Jewish pathogens—in order to rescue Germany.

The notion that Hitler and other Nazi leaders used these images in order to “dehumanize” Jews—and thus to kill them more easily—is erroneous. Hitler and his colleagues believed in the fantasies that they created and promoted.

Hitler’s conception of the Jew grew out of a certain kind of experience. Hitler experienced the idea of the Jew in a certain way. This experience of the Jew generated Hitler’s perception of reality. It is as if this idea or object—“the Jew”—was present within Hitler’s mind and body. The Jew was Hitler’s psychosomatic symptom. The “disease within the body politic” was a disease within Hitler’s own body.

Hitler’s rhetoric demonstrates how a source domain (the human body) becomes mapped onto a target domain (the body politic), thereby shaping one’s perception of reality. Hitler’s rhetorical metaphors play a cognitive function, revealing the source of his perceptions. Because Hitler projects the idea of a human body (his own) into the body politic, therefore he infers that Germany is suffering from a disease requiring diagnosis and cure.

According to Lakoff and Johnson, conceptual schemas organize our knowledge about, or perception of, reality. Our minds contain models about some aspect of the world that we use to comprehend our experience and reason about it. The central insight of conceptual metaphor theory is that schemas and cognitive models that organize our perceptions grow out of structures developed in relationship to our bodies: bodily experiences are projected into mental operations.

_______________________________________________________________________________________

Hitler's Ideology: A Study in Psychoanalytic Sociology

by Richard Koenigsberg

Why did Hitler initiate the Final Solution and take Germany to war? Through analysis of the images and metaphors contained within Hitler's writings and speeches, Koenigsberg reveals the deep structure of Hitler's belief system.

Hitler's Ideology is now available as an ebook at a special discount rate. For information on purchasing, click here.

“When political figures refer to national crises as "cancers," Richard Koenigsberg feels it's no accident. Such expressions echo a nation's hidden belief systems. If you can understand the fantasies that provide politicians with such rhetoric, then you can understand the country. This book presents an ingenious technique for identifying the psychological origins of political and social events.”
  —The Village Voice

“The best critical analysis in English of Hitler s thought.”
  —Colin Day

“Koenigsberg's genius has unlocked the secrets of a timeless drama.”
  —Journal of Psychoanalytic Anthropology
___________________________________________________________________

From Hitler’s Ideology

“How may we account for the shape and form of specific cultural ideas and ideologies? Why are certain ideas ‘passed along,’ and not others? How may we account for the intensity of affect that is attached to certain ideas? We have not dealt adequately with the problem of the causes of the popularity of an ideology within a given culture. Once an ideology has attained a degree of power, conventional explanations may come into play as a means of explaining the continuing power of this ideology. “These modes of explanation, however, cannot tell us why a given ideology has gained currency within a culture. They cannot explain why some ideas, among all the ideas present within a culture, have been “selected out” and, consequently, ‘passed along’.”

__________________________________________________________________________________

Click here for information on how to purchase the digital version of Nations Have the Right to Kill: Hitler, the Holocaust and War

Nations Have the Right to Kill

PRAISE FOR NATIONS HAVE THE RIGHT TO KILL

“R
ichard Koenigsberg is an intrepid generator and disseminator of ideas regarding the psychodynamics of human violence and destructiveness, ideas that are startling all the more for being self-evident once they have been absorbed. Koenigsberg’s ideas cut trenchantly through conventional, rationalized notions about culture, the nation, and war, and enable us to see through the psychic machinations of human institutions in utterly new ways.”

—Ruth Stein, New York University, author of For Love of the Father

__________________________________________________________________________

“Two terrors from long ago haunt. First, the Holocaust: that cold-blooded massacre of millions. Second, the ability of political leaders during two World Wars to convince ordinary people that slaughtering their neighbors was patriotic. A half-century later, we continue to ask: how was this possible? Richard A. Koenigsberg offers provocative answers. Koenigsberg’s analysis ranges from gender identity, to the First World War, to Aztec warfare. No single answer will exorcize our terrors. But Koenigsberg’s bold and original approach, clearly and precisely presented, will help us, if not to expel them, at least, finally, to comprehend them.”

—Robert Whalen, Queens University of Charlotte, author of Bitter Wounds: German Victims of the Great War, 1914-1939

_____________________________________________________________________________|
“Despite the vast body of research devoted to the Holocaust, Nations Have the Right to Kill marks a seminal contribution to our understanding. Koenigsberg challenges the belief that Hitler was a uniquely inhuman monster, placing him squarely within the narrative of the nationalist ideology that claims dying for one’s country represents the apogee of love and devotion. The Holocaust thus became ‘a perverted, degraded version of dying for the country—sacrificial death at the hands of the nation-state stripped of words like honor, heroism and glory."

—Brian A. Victoria, Antioch University, author of Zen at War
________________________________________________________________________

“In Nations Have the Right to Kill, Richard Koenigsberg poses disturbing and often ignored questions: ‘How can humans sacrifice millions for an abstract concept of “nation?” Is destruction and self-destruction the actual purpose of war?’ The answers are both insightful and unsettling. The strength of Nations is the use of original artifacts to support claims. Koenigsberg always begins with data. He takes a rhetorical approach by grounding his arguments in a careful analysis of Nazi writings, speeches and recorded correspondence and conversations. The point that nations grant their leaders the right to kill is powerfully documented.”

—E. Sam Cox, University of Central Missouri
____________________________________________________________________________

“Richard Koenigsberg’s Nations Have the Right to Kill reminds us in clear and incisive prose that sacrifice and total war are inextricably linked. Drawing on a broad range of knowledge spanning the social sciences, Koenigsberg asks us to conceive of the Holocaust as the product of an ideology that demanded the sacrifice of both Germany’s male population and European Jewry.”

—Brian E. Crim, Lynchburg College
_______________________________________________________________________

“Koenigsberg’s thesis is that there is a ‘fundamental dynamic that leads nations to go to war,’ independent of political circumstances. This purpose or driving force is destruction and self-destruction: a mass human sacrifice that elevates the nation to a sacred place at the expense of its people. In war, Koenigsberg says, ‘human bodies sacrificed in the name of perpetuating a magical entity, the body politic.’ This is a thoughtful, sometimes startling, well-written book: important and challenging.”

—E. James Lieberman, M.D.
________________________________________________________________________

“This is psychological inquiry of great depth and tragic urgency. A deep humanity and ethical urgency informs this book which is full of original and provocative insights.”

—Walter A. Davis, Professor Emeritus, Ohio State Universityz

__________________________________________________________________________

“Richard Koenigsberg represents an entirely orthogonal and de novo vantage on war. His academic lens is Psychology, and he has penetrated to a still-obscured truth of war in Modernity: That it is in essence the sacrificial—and thus transcendental—celebratory vessel of all human sacred identity. His essay is in its way a call-to-arms: To see at last our own buy-in culturally to a boundlessly destructive essence within our own humanity.”

—Michael Vlahos, United States Naval War College, author of *Fighting Identity: Sacred War and World Change
______________________________________________________

“Filling a gap in the scholarly narrative, Nations Have the Right to Kill uses a comparative framework to offer an intriguing exploration of the philosophical connections between war and genocide. Focusing on the Nazi case, Koenigsberg concludes that both the sacrifice of German soldiers in glory on the battlefield, and the sacrifice of victims in the gas chambers, served essentially the same purpose: to feed the sacrificial bloodlust of the national deity.”

—Journal of Genocide Research. Review by Megan D. Lee, University of South Carolina.

____________________________________________________________________

“Nations Have the Right to Kill offers a riveting examination of the ideology of political violence. Dr. Koenigsberg observes that the slaughter of hundreds of thousands in the 20th-century has been so continuous that it is taken as an immutable characteristic of history. To interrupt our historical attachment to war, we might begin by examining the mentality and ideology of those who perpetrate political violence. Through careful analysis of Hitler’s writings and speeches, Koenigsberg makes us aware of the ideology that was the source of both warfare and genocide. Dr. Koenigsberg’s is a message that anyone with an interest in changing the course of human history should internalize and reflect upon. Can human beings transcend war? If so, Nations Have the Right to Kill will be one of our most important guides. Its striking lucidity will be a catalyst for our collective evolution.”

—Lee Hall, JD