“The enemy and the conscript suffer the same threat and burden of physical destruction for the sake of making present sovereign power.”
Does it matter to which country the bodies--dead on the field of battle--belong? What is significant is the presence of mutilated human beings. Dead and mutilated bodies are generated in the name of verification. We find it inconceivable that monumental death, destruction and suffering are waged in the name of no thing. People must be dying in the name of some thing.

The goal of war is death

If people die, wars are successful. "History" is the generation of death in the name of a sacred ideal. That which we die for varies, but in our hearts the dream remains the same.

We may believe the cause is evil; we may believe the cause is virtuous: Lenin, Hitler, Stalin and Mao--and yes Abraham Lincoln--all used the same methodology: killing to prove the truth and reality of one's ideology.

If so many people die in the name of an Ideology, it must be real. Nazism, Communism--and "saving the Union"--became real by virtue of the number of deaths generated. There is a linear relationships: the greater the number of deaths, the greater the reality.

The essence of warfare  is VERIFICATION. 

From Paul H. Kahn, Sacred Violence

“The battlefield is strewn with the disemboweled and beheaded, with severed limbs and broken bodies. All have died a terrible death in a display of sovereign power. Viewing the battlefield from a certain distance, it is not even clear who is the object of sacrifice: the enemy and the conscript suffer the same threat and burden of physical destruction for the sake of making present sovereign power.”

Dead soldiers on a World War I battlefield.